Posted on: 27.05.2026
A senior financial communications search now takes longer than almost any other comms hire we run. Boards want someone who can handle media relations, write clearly about complex products, navigate regulatory sensitivities and hold their own in a crisis. They want them senior enough to advise the board, but hands-on enough to turn around a press line at 7am.
Sound familiar?
We’ve worked on dozens of these briefs. And we’ll say it plainly: financial communications is one of the most technically demanding and genuinely rare skill sets in the communications market right now. Here’s why — and how to approach it if you’re building one of these briefs yourself.
What makes financial communications uniquely difficult isn’t any single requirement, but the combination of non-negotiable ones.
The first is financial literacy. Your hire needs to understand what they’re communicating about. Not just the headlines, but the mechanics behind them. What does a basis point change actually mean? How does a fund restructure affect retail investors differently from institutional ones? Without genuine financial fluency, even a polished communicator will get caught out — by a journalist, a regulator, or an executive who loses patience fast.
The second is media and stakeholder judgment. This goes well beyond knowing which journalists cover what. It is the instinct to know when not to comment, how to manage a story that is building quietly before it breaks loudly, and how to brief a CEO who has never spoken to the FT before. That judgment takes years to develop and cannot be taught in an induction week. AI cannot replicate it either — this remains a deeply human discipline.
The third is regulatory awareness, and it matters as much as the first two. In financial services, a misplaced word is not just a PR problem. It can be a compliance one. Your hire needs to understand the FCA’s expectations around financial promotions, what can and cannot be said around results periods, and when legal needs to be in the room. This is a constraint that communications professionals in other sectors simply do not face.
Finding someone who does all three well — and who also fits your culture and seniority requirements — is a genuinely small pool.
Several forces have converged to make this harder than it was even two or three years ago.
Demand has increased. Public and political scrutiny of financial institutions has intensified, with continued questioning of how banks, asset managers and insurers communicate with their customers, regulators and the wider public. Boards that once treated communications as a support function now want it at the table. Senior roles have been created that did not exist five years ago.
Supply has not kept up. The pipeline of people entering financial communications from either direction — financial professionals learning to communicate, or communicators developing genuine financial fluency — is slow. It takes time to develop this profile, and there is no shortcut.
Retention has also become harder. The professionals who do have this skill set know their market value. Counter-offers are common. Notice periods are long. And unlike some sectors, poaching from competitors is complicated by confidentiality obligations and non-competes.
If you are building a brief right now, here are the three things we would anchor on.
Financial communications hiring is hard because it should be hard. The people who do this well are protecting something with real consequences — the reputation and licence to operate of institutions that millions of people interact with every day.
Getting the hire right takes time, precision and access to a network that most internal talent teams do not have. That is not a criticism. It is the reality of a small, specialist market.
If you are working on a senior financial communications hire, Allyson Kurian leads Hanson Search’s financial communications recruitment practice. Get in touch at allysonk@hansonsearch.com for a confidential conversation.